E-Mail 'Church Discipline – How the Church Should Discipline Members' To A Friend

by Jack Wellman · Print Print · Email Email

Email a copy of 'Church Discipline – How the Church Should Discipline Members' to a friend

* Required Field






Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.



Separate multiple entries with a comma. Maximum 5 entries.


E-Mail Image Verification

Loading ... Loading ...


Share this post:  |  |  |  | Twitter
Steven August 14, 2013 at 10:57 pm

I guess no one wants to comment on this one. Resistance to discipline is a measurement of pride.

David Miller August 15, 2013 at 11:51 am

Like most articles written on this subject you fail to discuss one small detail. What sins? Your church (I assume) is filled with sinners. I doubt there are any exceptions, so which sins are you willing to accept in your church and which ones are subject to church discipline. It all sounds so well and good until the rubber hits the road so to speak. We teach on how to deal with sinners in the church but we never identify the sins. Adultery but not gossip? Fornication but not slander? How about gambling? Social drinking? Playing the lottery? Your article is just more of the same empty attempts to say we are against sin by promoting a Scripture to accomplish our purposes. If I am wrong then finish the article more thoroughly and name the sins. Then get ready for an empty church.

Jack Wellman August 15, 2013 at 3:17 pm

Thank you Mr. Miller for your criticizing of this article. Did you read the letter that I sent to this person? It reveals what the sin was and it was constantly interrupting Bible Studies, board meetings and talking during services. God is not the author of confusion and so when there is no way to have a service, hold a Sunday school class or board meetings are not productive and nothing can get done because things can’t get passed because they are all angry at the shouting or arguing of one person, then it is necessary.

Adultery and fornication yes, that is sin and so is gossip and slandering someone. I believe the sins are those covered in the Bible for which I included only a couple of places, if you had read the verse in 1 Cor 5 and Titus 3. Do you not believe that a disruptive person should be allowed to interrupt services, board meetings and Sunday school classes where nothing can be accomplished? These sins were identified in church, regularly during services, and in this article and precisely in this letter that I wrote and left blank the name to protect the person’s identity on the Internet. What would you do with this person? Please give me an idea. Tell me what you would do? Thank you for your comment and critique of this article.

Nick Curran April 17, 2014 at 11:06 am

The problem I see here is other than administrative sanction for clear and obvious misbehaviour in the church itself like “constantly interrupting Bible Studies, board meetings and talking during services”, the other sins are likely to either be so private that you don’t hear about them or they constitute rumours from another church goer to which the sinner in question will likely deny it and then you have a “he said she said” with little evidence to go on and a church community that will begin to rupture as people start ratting on each other and forming sides as such.

We’re not living in small communities today where we live with each other and the sins directly affect the community. Many of the sins in question are for the most part personal and sins against God as opposed to against the community for which such a sanction would be more appropriate. Then there’s concept of church leaders who are sinners disciplining lay persons who sin. So who then disciplines the church leaders when they sin, sometimes continually and without repentence? See in criminal justice law enforcement is only able and authorized to act so long as they remain law abiding. You can’t enforce the law and an offender yourself.

Unless we’re dealing with a very public sin and a very public sinner, then this concept as presented becomes extremely dicey.

Jack Wellman April 17, 2014 at 11:32 am

Amen brother….spot on. We are facing in the church that I am under-shepherd of a church discipline issue. I have dealt with a lady 3 times now and the next step is disfellowshipping her. She has constantly gossiped about prayer requests to outsiders and non-believers and also caused great division in the church and now, after last Sunday’s Sunday school class, she said that I, the pastor, said that “We should follow Hitler’s orders” which what I really said is that cults are like what Hitler did to Nazi Germany and the followers at first were anxious because of the great depression that nation was in but later they obeyed out of fear and that is what a cult is like in some ways. She took my words and twisted them and now is going public to other believers and to the general public that “The pastor said that we should obey Hitler!” Wow. See why church discipline has to occur but I do so as a very, very last resort. Thanks Nick I so agree with what you said so well my friend. Thank you and I thank God for you. You speak the truth.

nick curran April 18, 2014 at 12:21 pm

Amen pastor Wellman and shall I hope that this weekend arguably the most important season in the Christian life gives you a renewed sense of joy and reflection regarding the single most important relationship that anyone can have that being with our Lord and savior Jesus Christ.

“I have dealt with a lady 3 times now and the next step is disfellowshipping her.”

I agree and think that you’ve chose the right course of action in this regards. Clearly you’ve meditated on the issue and asked the Lord for guidance. You could have and still could pursue this in civil court by way of a defamation suit. In this day and age some falsely accusing you of saying that “We should follow Hitler’s orders” when you have evidence to the contrary would by the account of MOST legal experts put you on solid ground to launch such a civil action, especially given the damage it could do to your name, your church and membership and Christians generally today. If you have as the scripture says (Matthew 18), approached the would be defendant with your true statement and asked them to recant, once privately, and secondly in the same manner before the church public or congregation, then the third step could also be service of an intention to sue. If this was the case and I were hired by that woman who assailed you in such a matter I’d instantly phone your legal counsel and start negotiations on a settlement knowing that there is no way I could defend such a suit.

You however have followed the teaching in Matthew 18 to the letter taking the third step of having (or in the case of a lay person calling for) the disassociation of the member by way of no longer having fellowship with her. Here your intentions are pure, undefiled by desire for monetary gain and demonstrate true Christian Character. You’re not so much concerned with making your name made whole in the eyes of others while hurting her but denouncing sin within the confines of the Christian community. Bravo!

Catholics call this excommunication as you are well aware. Many mainline Protestants reject this kind of church discipline some even saying its like trying take someone’s Christian credentials away from them. To that I say nonsense! Fact is the offender can always recant of his offence if he wants to remain in the community in question with all its rights and privileges. Secondly, NOBODY can take away your “Christian credentials” in any significant manner safe the Lord at the time of your judgment. Finally and I guess this is a denominational thing. A Christian community that expresses its devotion to Christ by following specific discipline (the term for which is religion) has every right to express and promote that discipline. That being said, it also has the right to demand that its members do likewise. So when you have public figures or celebrities engaging in all manner of sin and immorality or expressing beliefs that are contrary to the church’s teachings then they have every right to excommunicate or disengage in fellowship with them. This is not saying “no you’re not a Christian” (you might be or not) but its saying “no you are not a Catholic or Calvary Baptist or whatever … kind of Christian. That particular denomination has every right to preserve its name as a church as well as preserving the good name and character of the broader Christian community. They do not have to sit back and watch someone publicly misrepresent their form of Christian discipline. I wish some of the mainline Protestants would stick their noses in the bible and do such. When guys like the Kennedys and Barack Obama for example go around espousing infanticide (abortion) and homosexuality then for the “family vote” say that they are Christian by virtue of supporting “social justice issues” I can see and hear true Christians nation-wide sighing and groaning. I mean Hugh Heffner supports charity and social justice yet given his lifestyle at least he’s got the dignity not to claim to be an observant Jew.

Just my thoughts.

Jack Wellman April 18, 2014 at 12:30 pm

Mr. Curran…thank you so much sir and this step is being taken after much thought and prayer and giving her the chance to repent and recant or at least apologize. Sadly, what has been done is done and you cannot unscramble an egg. I fear the shame on Christ and His church. The three elements missing so badly today are regular administration of the Sacraments, weekly expository Bible-centered preaching and church discipline and the last of these three are sorely missing in the last 3 churches I attended. I am responsible to Christ as He is the Head of this church and I am only an under-shepherd to the Great Shepherd and so I must give an account to Him for this someday. I believe it is better to face the church’s discipline than it is God Himself for one way or the other, a disobedient, divisional, talebearer and really, slanderer, will be dealt with….by the church and if not the church (which is sin if we don’t) then God will do so and He may not be as gentle for she is really slandering the Body of Christ and that is Jesus Himself. It is like a member of the church would be the hand and she takes mud and slings it on the Body and so this hand must be severed temporarily it is hoped, that she repent and for now, delivered to Satan for the chastisement of the flesh to save her soul (as Paul once said over something about church discipline). I thank God for you sir that there are men of faith who still believe that this needs to be done…and as hard as it is….you make me feel better over one of the most difficult things that there are. Many tares are in the wheat but when a tare is clearly marked, it should be removed to allow the wheat to be nourished and not be tarnished or nutrient robbed. Thank you sir.

rmharrington May 17, 2014 at 5:39 pm

Hello, Brother Jack.

Wonderful article. I really like the phrase “opposite of love is not hatred but indifference.” As always, you are spot-on. Sorry to hear that you are having so much trouble in your church. It seems a common thing now days. Perhaps it is due to the current concept that says “every opinion is equal — even if it doesn’t align with Scripture.”

I do urge you to move carefully. There seems to be much church discipline that is more about tradition than it is about truth. Of course, I know that you are always seeking truth.

Great work brother.

Jack Wellman May 17, 2014 at 5:44 pm

My brother and friend Michael, thank you so much for such encouragement. Yes, this was a slow, careful, and deliberate process that I am taking my time in. I have read from the godly men of the past like Jonathan Edwards, Martin Luther, and A.W. Tozier that if any of these three things are missing then that particular church is doomed; regular administration of the sacraments, regular expository Bible-centered preaching, and church discipline. Thanks friend. May my future be in His hands, even if I end up as an itinerant pastor.

Cari Strepka August 10, 2018 at 8:55 am

As a member of a church that practices church discipline, what is the responsibility of the members who are friends with the member that’s been excommunicated? My close friend was excommunicated several years ago and she is not repentative/she retaliated with anger toward the church. Do I cut off all contact with her? I don’t socialize with her but 1-2/year, and I try to share what the Bible says about her actions. But perhaps I am only being a hindrance to her being convicted instead?

Jack Wellman August 10, 2018 at 9:43 am

The Bible teaches that we are to treat them as an unbeliever, so this means you can still speak to them but don’t associate with them like go out to dinner or be close friends. Since we’re to not have fellowship with them we must pray for them to repent and return to the Lord. I would let God work on her heart as only God can change the heart (prov 21:1). We cannot but only make it worse.

Jack Wellman August 10, 2018 at 12:05 pm

PS…thank you for caring for your friends who was ex-communicated. Paul said deliever such a one (a disfellowshipped person) to Satan to let him buffet them in this world in the hopes of their repenting & returning to God. I know its easy to interfere with what God’s doing, but thank you for caring.

Bianca August 20, 2018 at 8:31 am

Hi pastor, I have a question, I have committed fornication Twice and I have been warned if I do it again I will be disfollowed for good, is there such a thing of being disfollowed for good even if you ask for forgiveness

Jack Wellman August 20, 2018 at 8:56 am

Yes, the Bible speaks of those being put out of the church and delivered to Satan for the saving of the soul, or to let the Devil and his demons have their way with them until the sinner repents. 1 Cor 6, Rev 21:8, and many others show that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God. If you don’t do it again, you should be okay but God Himself will discipline those whom He loves, but the church has the authority (Matt 18) to discipline and if necessary, disfellowship someone for this sin. God wants the church to remain holy and not be full of fornicators as they won’t be going to heaven.

ellen October 12, 2018 at 7:43 am

everything here was very helpful:)

Kau December 5, 2018 at 2:33 pm

Pastor Jack wellman My son in law has a business in logistics. He is a council member in the church. Every time he comes back from overseas on a business trip he ends up buying duty free alcohol from the airport and brings it to his house and later he gives it out to friends or people who does favors for him. I have Informed my pastor about it and he told me that it’s a sensitive issue that if he confronts him then he might ask who told him since we are family and might bring division in the family. My pastor told me that he will let it play out and will continue to pray for him and that he might repent but it’s only last year 2017 that I told my pastor about this issue but my son in law has been doing this for the past 5 years and our daughter has been calling it the business alcohol. Every time we do street outreach He preaches against the use of alcohol drugs etc.Since My son in law is one of the church council member, what will happen if this continues in The church?

Jack Wellman December 5, 2018 at 4:01 pm

Hello Kau. Thank you so much for your comment and this is not a good situation and you have good judgment that payng friends back for their favors with alcohol is wrong. Many of these friends may be former alcoholics and may be tempted to return to this addiction, and so this is very serious. If this happened in the church where I pastor at, then I would speak with the man personally and privately and say, it was brought to my attention that you are bringing alcohol to people as a way to payback their favor (which is wrong, since this robs the giver of their blessing) but it may make someone return to their alcholism and it sends a bad message to all who know about this that a way to repay your friends is to buy them alcohol. You cannot preach against alcohol and then pass it out. That is hypocritical. God is not pleased with this, as you can imagine. The pastor should not ever worry about the qeustion, “Who told you this,” because that person is evading the question, and I would tell him, “It doesn’t matter who told me…it does matter that this is wrong.” THe pastor must “Be the pastor!” and sometimes its difficult, but that’s what God’s called us pastors to do. Rebuke, exhort, correct, and admonish..those are all commanded of pastors! Please have your pastor contact me. Praying….you are right that this is wrong. If it continues, it may be time to find another church, and I wouldn’t be surprised if others do the same in time or after they hear about this (and they will!)!

Ana Giddens June 4, 2019 at 8:22 am

I strongly believe in implementing Matthew 18:15-18, but only in instances where someone’s soul us in jeopardy. Disruption of a service is merely an inconvenience to the speaker. This is exactly why many churches refuse to implement this much needed protocol.





Previous post:

Next post: